The concerns from the left are symptomatic of a movement that has grown understandably disillusioned with electoral politics. Some of the critics are likely worried that New Yorkers who turned out in droves to support Mamdani this summer have been hoodwinked by another Democrat voicing sympathy for the Palestinian cause when it’s politically convenient while trying at the same time to please his pro-Israel detractors.

Mamdani’s responses, though, have reinforced the frustrations of many pro-Palestine advocates on the left — that ceding ground on what constitutes acceptable speech on Palestine puts the entire campaign to end both Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land and its genocide in Gaza at risk.

The question of whether a rising star like Mamdani can effectively stake out a pro-Palestine stance while succeeding in mainstream electoral politics is high on many Democrats’ minds. A growing part of the party’s base is refusing to support candidates who cave to pro-Israel pressure campaigns. And a growing number of Democrats, including recipients of money from the country’s leading pro-Israel lobby, are calling on the U.S. to stop sending offensive weapons to Israel.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Last time I checked the left have been declared terrorists. This is literally McCarthyism 2.0 right now.

    But sure, let’s purity test Mamdani and wring our hands about whether giving Palestinians some rights is politically viable.

    I have a possible solution. Ban all political donations from foreign entities. Eliminate all the loop holes. It is disgusting they are allowed to funnel money to our politicians.

    • spider@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Indeed, because then we inevitably get stuck with more conservative Democrats whose allegiance to Israel (via AIPAC) supersedes allegiance to their own country.