• America@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The paper from 1942 was meant to establish long standing scientific curiosity about the topic, you.

    • U7826391786239@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      you goober.

      you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience. the fact that you’re trying to, and then calling me “goober” is quite enough for me to say: best of luck, tiger

      • America@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree with you, but you have to put forward a point that doesn’t stand atop misunderstanding a citation, or else I’ll name you another foodstuff

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              What?

              I’ve literally never heard of goober as meaning peanut.

              I thought it basically just meant ‘glob’ when describing a physical thing, and when describing a person, basically the same as ‘derpy’, like uh, silly, absent minded, something like that, and is mostly meant in an at least semi endearing way.

              • croizat@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s why the Goofy Goober from SpongeBob is a peanut (there’s also a peanut candy called goobers)

              • America@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s a borrowed African word. Borrowed in the 1800s. Borrowed by Americans. Borrowed. But it eventually shifted at some point in the last century to the definition most people are familiar with, though I can’t figure out how or why.