The University of Rhode Island’s AI lab estimates that GPT-5 averages just over 18 Wh per query, so putting all of ChatGPT’s reported 2.5 billion requests a day through the model could see energy usage as high as 45 GWh.

A daily energy use of 45 GWh is enormous. A typical modern nuclear power plant produces between 1 and 1.6 GW of electricity per reactor per hour, so data centers running OpenAI’s GPT-5 at 18 Wh per query could require the power equivalent of two to three nuclear power reactors, an amount that could be enough to power a small country.

  • MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Arguably, a great deal more than the energy you lose from opening the door to your house in the summer, once while the A/C is running.

    Or, looking at it another way, an AI query+result can be just as valuable as a Tik Tok post / view.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I consider TikTok harmful, so you are right about your last sentence.

      But my AC does not nor ever has actually consumed 4kW in an hour.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The average (US suburban 2200sq ft) home’s A/C does consume 4kW while it is cycled on, and in the hotter than normal months of summer it can run continuous duty cycle for hours on end.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Me, personally, we have trees and shade. So many subdivisions don’t, and they have dark colored roofs, and then homeowners do bone-headed things like adding “sun rooms” - lots of those in Houston.

            We get upset when our electric bill passes $300 for the month, but our neighbors with the 3500 sq ft? They never see it under $400.