• untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just dropped from a lead position to non-lead because of this. The only work time is office time+travel for work. Outside of that work does not exist.

    • That’s a big quality of life change. I wasn’t super enthused about going up the chain for a long time, but then found I really enjoyed the strategic planning and organizational stuff, so went up a couple levels of management. The money was a quality of life change, too, of course.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Eh. I could make more at work but the that stuff doesn’t drive me, actually triggers severe burn out. I have a savings/debt paydown/investment strategy that gets me where I need to go.

        It was also a company switch to one with stability, steady raises, better benefits, and more interesting work. So while it’s a significant trade off in salary, quality of life is vastly improved.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It for sure sounds like the right decision for you. And to be sure I was clear, when I eventually went up a leadership ladder, I was more motivated by the job than by the money, it’s just that the money was nice too. I was at the same company for just short of 40 years. I moved around some within the company to keep things interesting, and then realized my experience would be pretty useful for strategic leadership, and that I’d enjoy that kind of thing.

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I think that makes sense. Having stability in life is going to be a different world tbh. 20-40yrs is a long time in personal development