• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unlike this place, I bet most people out there actually enjoy Google’s AI summaries. I mean, it’s almost the Wikipedia article verbatim, but if you just need to know what a thing is, they actually save people time

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And in return, they drive traffic away from the sites that collect the information in the first place, causing the sources to lose revenue.

        • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It saves them money in the same sense it saves every other information source money, it reduces traffic. But just like other sites can’t serve ads without traffic, Wikipedia can’t prove its worth and ask for donations without traffic. Eventually, people will start asking themselves why they need to support Wikipedia when Google’s AI tells them everything they need to know, unaware that Google’s AI can only do so because it scrapes Wikipedia without paying for it.