Empiricist Old-Testament Vajrayana, battered enough by life to have grown-up some, in my nearly-6-decades, autistic geek, philosopher who finds that Western philosophers are nowhere near at the level of correct-thinking of the Vajrayana stuff, & will be tearing-into Marx, etc, for their brainos ( Marx found that capitalism alienated workers, so he replaced capitalism with communism, which somehow “didn’t” alienate workers?? I’ve already cracked the underlying error, but that is a long article. It’ll happen. & so will the dismantling of the other philosophers’ bogons, the whole lot of 'em. : )

  • 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 27th, 2025

help-circle








  • Sociopathy & psychopathy are defects-of-emotional-social-function.

    This is ideological, not sane.

    The WHOLE someone needs to be functioning, for the LIFE to be functioning.

    Programmed-dysfunction, as distorted “education” ( like the memorization-rooted, authority-worshipping “education” of the past few millenia ) is, results in the kind of “civilization” that the Deep South embodied, in Angela Davis’s horrifying-history filled “Women, Race, & Class” book ( seriously: that book NEEDS to be required of all highschoolers, globally, alongside an equivalent book on nazism, & one on stalinism ).

    Human COMPLETE is what we’re supposed to be growing, not human, partial.

    _ /\ _



  • How very western-centric…

    Identify what the culture conserves, & then you can know what’s going on…

    Do they conserve integrity?

    Do they cnoserve objectivity?

    Do they conserve exclusive-validity ( normal, on this world )?

    Do they conserve exclusive-wealth?

    Just because the ones that YOU focus-on conserve in a narcissistic/machiavellian way, DOESN’T mean that the word “conservative” magically only operates as your political-assumptions dictate.

    ( this point is on the MECHANISM of political-narcissism, not just on this particular point.

    Politically-motivated people seem to relentlessly, throughout millenia, presume that NO perspective outside of THEIR context, has any validity.

    Want another example?

    Look up to the north hemisphere’s polestar, at solstices & equinoxen.

    The shape that the Big Dipper forms, around the polestar, those 4 nights, is called, in Sanskrit, “swastika”.

    Who “owns” it?

    Hindu, Buddhist, Hopi, & Navaho?

    According to White laws, the ONLY possessor/owner of it, is nazis.

    It is ILLEGAL to have the Hindu, Buddhist, Hopi, or Navaho symbol in one’s possession, in some countries, because ONLY white-supremacists have VALIDITY in such laws:

    non-whites aren’t valid, nazis are valid, therefore the swastika only means what they meant, right?

    Narcissism.

    The concept/principle goes much further, though:

    Addiction’s “self inherently” bad, right?

    Whites believe that, consistently.

    Addiction-to-wisdom, addiction-to-growing-up, addiction-to-growing-underestanding, addiction-to-evolving, these AREN’T EVEN POSSIBLE ADDICTIONS, according to White culture…

    Narcissism.

    It isn’t the addiction-mechanism that is the problem, it iis the actual addiction-anchors, that is the problem.

    It isn’t the swastika that is the problem, it is nazism that is the problem.

    It isn’t conservatism that is the problem, it is ideological-supremacism that is the problem.

    I wish humankind would quit gaslighting, but … that is too much to ask, isn’t it?

    The most objective, universally-framed perspective is consistently more-accurate than the ideologically-convenient politically-motivated perspective, IF intellectual-integrity is something one is addicted to.

    Feynman evolved, as a person, because he was conservative about integrity: he conserved that, & lt-go-of his misogynistic-past-nature.

    That is admirable, worthy accomplishing.

    Cosnervatism isn’t self-inherently what’s being claimed in the post’s perspective: that is ideological “truth”, not objectivity’s position. )

    _ /\ _