mygog i jus rlli dun look at womn anymor hm?..,.

dun evn care vrri much for the cat look - jus - jus.,…

yea…,. womn r amazin… im happi for thm,.

EDIT: im hidin dis post- evil feels comin up with it-

mhm ;(((((((

a-,…,… ~ummm…,. - - - - - o-.,. _oki,.,…, floof 🫂💖💖💖👩‍❤️‍👩👧…,…,…,…,…

thad be coool <3<3<3<3

i bettr be a grl in two years-

nunu they allow me to.,… but thanksi either way <3

i wan be grl

they kibsa always did that with stock photos - i dun get why they wud geberate imags tho- plenty cc0 pizza pics online ~

The fact that it responded only with “no” implies a convo exchange previously, in which it was prompted to either

• respond exactly with “no”

or

• keep the response short

it seems like the first case applies here, since it actually gives a little post-amble at the image gen response.

Apparently, with chatgpt, it foesnt actually look st the generated image. Otherwise it would be able to tell, that the users image is equivalent to the generated one (since the tokens would be literally identical, so its like asking an llm “are these two paragraphs the same text?”

aaaaaaanyway- dont use VLMs to check if an image was generated! there r actual models trained for that task. VLMs r not.

its not smoke! its ~ fog ~