Track_Shovel
Fortunately, woodland creatures don’t hire lawyers
- 1.36K Posts
- 416 Comments
Lol. Look at this guy, able to have more than one person interested in him.
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Having something someone wantsEnglish
232·5 days ago
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Having something someone wantsEnglish
64·5 days agoI wish. I have dug enough pits, I probably have a dead one stuck in my sinuses or something
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Having something someone wantsEnglish
14213·5 days agoWoah. Didn’t hear about that. I (nearly literally) live under a rock with some isopods, though, so that might explain why. Turns out two things can be true: you can be a giant piece of shit, and still have the occasional good take, I guess.
FUCK YOU, MORON
(Is that better?)
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.nettoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Great mainstream social media postEnglish
2·7 days agoThat and anything even possibly AI generated
We are on (what feels like) our 8th spring thaw
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Separating from Canada Would Be an Economic Disaster for AlbertaEnglish
2·13 days agoThat’s a fair point, about blocking pipelines. BC is in the same boat in that regard.
Oil is a tough one - it’s a very valuable resource but it’s got a big stigma tied to it due to GHGs and spills. I wish we were collectively doing more about climate change, rather than just using it as an argument when it suits us, but that’s beside the point
On the whole, we need to be a lot more collaborative. Western resentment is real, and somewhat justified, but you don’t cut off your arm to spite your finger
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Separating from Canada Would Be an Economic Disaster for AlbertaEnglish
51·13 days agoBecause we are a country, and patriotic people, not Patriots™ support people in other parts of the country. It’s not AB vs QC or the east - we are unified.
Also, please stop downvoting this guy. Maybe an unpopular take, but it’s central to the broader discussion and directly tied to the article itself
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Separating from Canada Would Be an Economic Disaster for AlbertaEnglish
5·13 days agoAll of it, I hope. I would much rather pay for education than line the pockets of megacorps.
Do you know how much the reclamation liability is for the oil sands? 200 billion. We have 2 billion saved to clean it up. That works out to $41,200 in cost per man, woman, and child, but sure, let’s focus on $650 per person.
I would put money on oilsands companies shuttering their mines once or becomes clear there is no way to get product to market, or that it’s much more expansive to do so. Shell already did this when OPEX costs got too high. TOTAL also pulled out.
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Separating from Canada Would Be an Economic Disaster for AlbertaEnglish
30·14 days agoIn 2021, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation pegged Albertans’ contribution to equalization as $650 per capita.
Lol. Lmao even.
Let’s risk a very unclear future, sold to us by utopian libertarians over $650 per person.
I’m Albertan. I’m also quite Liberal, so kind of rare in these parts.
Anyway, I just can’t wrap my head around the logic of the separatist have. Cut off ALL federal programs. Make your own programs, which is more than likely going to be blindingly more expensive due inefficiencies in starting from scratch. Cut all income tax (are you stupid?). Institute PST, something that is political sepukku in Alberta. Oh. And don’t forget to base your economy on a marginal product, with no access to foreign markets, whose commodity prices are controlled by a cartel.
Get the fuck out, and come back to me with some valid logic
I had to look it up, and yes, excellent eyes
If you’re not pestering the shit out of your wife, are you even married? My wife (perhaps unwisely) chose an intelligent (she’ll tell you otherwise, when I forget to replace the garbage bag) and funny man. Now she spends half her day rolling her eyes, or crinkling her nose at me (she’s particularly pretty when she does that), or swatting my hand away from her bottom.
Yank is often a Brit or Commonwealth term, hence the confusion on my end.
I’m Canadian. Calling us yanks earns you a withering stink eye at best, and a ‘Hey, bud…’ if you keep insisting.
Patron and Jack? You’d expect top shelf stuff at the Whitehouse, but then you just have to look at who is in office…
Who are you calling yank, you tea slurping, vegamite licking heathen?




unrelated: that double negative is throwing me for a fucking loop, but the coffee hasn’t kicked in.
I think “It’s unlikely that in a 4 person polycule that at least one of them isn’t nonbinary” is the better way to phrase it. I’m not trying to be pedantic here. I’m just wrestling (aloud) with the structure of the sentence.
Related: Why would a polycule almost always have a non-binary member? I’m not up to date on this stuff, but I could see a bi polycule working, or something like that, with them all aligning with their typical (i use this word lightly, for lack of a better one) gender.