The easiest tell is the creators thinking anyone even knew who Eg Begkey Jr was anymore,.let alone cares what he thinks.

Literally what we are saying. I don’t think we are understanding what you’re trying to reinforce.

I’m not sure if you mean “trust” as in a handshake or not, but that’s not what we’re talking about about. At larger scales, everything is done in written contracts, strictly. Shit rolls DOWNhill if those are not airtight, and that’s when lawsuits kick off.

Not true. I’ve been involved in litigation with both AWS and Google over unsecured comms that were defined as being TLS secured in SLA/SLO contracts and found not to be. Not that anything nefarious was happening necessarily, but the expectation is clear.

Whether these asshats even check for such requirements with a Musk run company right now 🤷

It COULD possibly be that they are logging every exchange happening at the network fabric between the service layers, but nobody knows unless they intentionally take steps to investigate or accidentally prove it.

Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn’t put a hard “no” on that possibility.

Progressive? Just flipping through this stuff, she’s obviously not a Progressive. Anarchist, maybe. Never heard of her. Can’t say anything she’s writing about is landing whatsoever with me, so probably why. Lots of complaining and zero constructive ideas.

I’m not downvoting the general sentiment of the title here, just the content.

This is AWFUL writing. A lot of circular reasoning with no real points landed on the topic at hand, and ZERO exposition in expressing that idea whatsoever.

I looked up the “author”, and they’ve only been posting content for a few weeks, which leads me to believe this is a spam post. Only her “husband” posts content or appears in camera, which makes me think this is a fake account altogether.

How would this have been organically found when this writer is relatively unknown according to hits and traffic?

Also handy heard anything like that. Supporting info appreciated.

Hard to take anything these morons take seriously. I’d need to see some receipts to even half believe this isn’t the setup to declare an emergency in an attempt to delay or deny the midterm outcomes.

If it’s just a modem with no WiFi, then it’s not capable of this specific thing.

That’s what they are deploying. This has been possible for awhile, but has recently gotten much creepier: https://groundy.com/articles/wifi-densepose-full-body-tracking-through-walls-using-your/

Nope: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wi-fi-routers-used-to-detect-human-locations-poses-within-a-room

It’s gotten even more capable where it can basically act as a presence sensor through walls as well. It’s not simple device tracking at all.

And saddle them with the debt. Fuck the investors and the cyclical scam machine. They should forfeit that money outright.

So a right-wing arm of a polling scam to poison public opinion? Seems like it should be illegal.

You guys are already doing the max in dealing with this lunatic. Keep doing what you’re doing until we can get this tumor removed.

Less than a day old turf account. Nobody is listening to you.

Nice account there. Shame if something happened to it…

Unlock works fine for me with no manual adjustments.

Works fine with any adblocker.

You seem to have zero knowledge on the subject, so let me educate you a lil bit:

Data isn’t treated like physical evidence.

Drugs and weapons are physical evidence.

US laws do not cover any protections of ephemeral (non-physical) evidence pertaining to crimes committed ex post facto: meaning law enforcement is not privy to any and all collection of said data if not in scope for a crime committed, unlike…PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.

You can see drugs. You can hold drugs. Law enforcement can make a reasonable assumption that someone shooting a gun in public is breaking the law and seize that gun, because they are actually breaking the law (juris laws dependent) by firing the gun.

If suddenly our laws allowed the assumption that whatever exists on a phone for a random person in public contains something related to a crime, police would be able to stop anyone and everyone on the street everywhere and take their phone or data for simply thinking every person is suspicious. This is why the 4th amendment exists, and why police are enot allowed to do such things. His is why warrants are a thing.

Read up.