

Hmm. If you are confident that learning from ai will work out for you better than learning from humans or human created materials, go ahead.
But as I said it doesn’t work in the real world.
-
AI has been shown to make people stupid and mad.
-
All professors know this. Students are using llms to cheat in exams and skip learning.
-
Gen Z has the lowest attention span and reading comprehension skills mostly due to ai summaries. Few can even sit down and read a book anymore.
-
Using ai for coding and “agents” have eroded the skills of developers. Many have said so and I have seen it among my colleagues too.
I have a feeling we won’t make any progress here. I’ll stick to learning from humans and the learning materials they have left us.


I wrote it to prove that for most people LLMs impair learning.
Yes counting the billionaire subsidies. But it’s very costly on the planet.
Sorry most people do. Few people use heroin to get better from sickness doesn’t mean the majority of people who get their hands on it will abuse it.
Everything you said is anecdotal—that too a very unpopular opinion at that. Lol.
yay we both agree. What has worked in schools is banning a calculator until a student gets proficient in basic arithmetic and math.
That’s what has worked. You can obviously use a calculator to check your answers etc without cheating and get better at math.
But that rarely happens in the real world.
If you haven’t done even a little bit of assembly then you don’t know the fundamentals of CS—how a processor works etc. Yes I would criticize such devs.
They fool you into thinking that you learned a lot. Why don’t you learn something with ai and then take a university exam or apply it in the world with chatgpt off?
I’m sure you’ll fail horribly.