I believe the early Microsoft one did that well, but the popular ones (grok, chathpt, Gemini) will only when asked (in my experience).

Can you provide an example?

My optimism tells me this issue will be short lived. Unless someone can find a very creative way to monetize AI so that it is sustainable, it will likely crash (with local instances continuing to get development).

It’s great! I felt the “no Wikipedia” was short sighted (UNLESS one of the teaching goals was doing research in an actual library!).

Wikipedia is better than an encyclopedia, IMO, because the references are super easy to follow.

I spent some years in classrooms as a service provider when Wikipedia was all the rage. Most districts had a “no Wikipedia” policy, and required primary sources.

My kids just graduated high school, and they were told NOT to use LLM’s (though some of their teachers would wink). Their current college professors use LLM detection software.

AI and Wikipedia are not the same, though. Students are better off with Wikipedia as they MIGHT read the references.

Still, those students who WANT to learn will not be held back by AI.

NOW we’re talking!

“This sounds like a your carrier problem, not an eSIM problem.”

This is true, and we the consumer have no control of the carrier decisions. With a physical SIM, we have at least a little.

I’ll accept it! 😊

“Far center extremists have hacked the power grid to make LLM’s more understandable. Click the link to learn how to protect yourself.”

You mean…Satan?!?

And Windows isn’t telling them. That’s part of the issue. If Cortana could tell them “this boot was slow because your video driver missed an update necessary for other system packages. Would you like me to show you how to fix that now?” that would be a win for your typical user.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Handset_Alliance

Google doesn’t “own” Android. They (and the OHA) are the maintainers. AOSP is open source.

Are you certain you’ll be able to do this? Do you have more info?

What happened to the Open Handset Alliance?

Sure, but many will cite a news organization’s opinion page as fact. Is this a good reason for any administration to target opinion pages?

The administration is supposed to represent the Constitution, not attack it.

Remember your constitution; particularly the 1st amendment.

It’s always been a jumping-off point, not a primary source. It’s still fantastic that way.