We not really here for the moral and ethical concerns of modern society we’re only here for the lulz.

Ah yeah, I found the highly upvoted comments justifying the rape of 14 year olds. Y’know because the “consenting nature of 14 year olds” makes it justifiable because they won’t be traumatized when grown men rape them.

Y’all have certainly made it clear what kind of community you’re fostering here.

Disgusting.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/62123620/25963349

Steven Tyler forced his rape victim to have an abortion after he impregnated her because he was also her legal guardian.

But no, you’re right. It’s much more acceptable.

“Consenting nature of 14 year olds” when talking about rape isn’t an explanation, it’s justification.

Steven Tyler took his victim on tour as his sex slave.

This individual’s experience shouldn’t be extrapolated to Steven Tyler’s victims. They’re not the same people.

Holy shit, I didn’t realize this community actually harbored people rationalizing the rape of 14 year olds.

What the fuck.

I’m not opposed to the idea of Cascadia. But it would be a hard fought battle to do so.

And on top of their poor performance, machines were probably fucked with and a host of other ways to fuck with the election because Trump cheats if he can.

Am I ignoring it?

That was their job - to show the voters the difference between Biden 2.0 and modern Hitler. They didn’t do a good job at all.

And on top of their poor performance, machines were probably fucked with and a host of other ways to fuck with the election because Trump cheats if he can.

Not even that big, hm?

I’m aware. There’s a lot of ways to be funny without punching down. Y’all just don’t care enough to be that clever.

There are quite a few posters here that don’t have to resort to treating women as objects to make a joke.

Because god forbid a woman make a joke about men in this community. THEN you all very much care.

Maybe I’m the weird one for always reading all of the comments in a post haha. OP posted the video in a comment and it was immediately clear that this lady was talking about men judging women’s body hair publicly.

The Bush jokes seemed like low hanging fruit that no one could resist.

Nothing wrong with talking about expectations prior to banging.

In theory - yes. But in practice it would be rude and / or ruining the moment.

Much more rude to tell a woman you don’t want to fuck her after she’s taken her clothes off.

Since reading comprehension has escaped you here - I said it’s more rude to share you won’t fuck hairy women after clothes are off. It is a better idea to be upfront about how you can’t get your dick hard unless a woman is hairless rather than share that after clothes have already come off.

I said absolutely fucking NOTHING about rape or forcing people to have sex they don’t want.

I wasn’t making a moral judgment with my comment, just observing the punch line.

It’s either women with daddy issues are funny or women are things like treats that men can use to self soothe.

Never said he did. I’m saying it’s probably better to bring up such a strong preference before clothes come off.

There was no need to use “females” at all in that sentence structure.

No one was talking about that here. YOU brought up rape unprovoked.

Rape isn’t funny.

I don’t think they were arguing with you, but rather expanding on your comment.

We can’t humanize this woman in this community lest you gain the ire of all the men who want to laugh about women with daddy issues.

Women with daddy issues are funny, right?

Come on now - that’s the joke. Anyone care to explain it better?