It sounds like a bunch of Democrats want to cave in exchange for no concessions whatsoever. Edit: Bloomberg has more details

Current likely Democratic votes for this:

  • Shaheen - NH
  • Hassan - NH
  • King - ME
  • Fetterman - PA
  • Peters - MI
  • Durbin - IL
  • Warner - VA
  • Kaine - VA
  • Ossoff- GA
  • Warnock - GA

If you want to change things, you need to call their DC office NOW, and leave an email if you can’t.

Edit 2: enough Democrats joined the Republicans to reopen the government with no real concessions.

The list:

  • Durbin
  • Hassan
  • King
  • Cortez Masto
  • Kaine
  • Shaheen
  • Rosen
  • Fetterman
  • Schumer
  • Gillibrand

There was a caucus meeting right before this, so the bulk of the Senate Democrats were likely OK with giving in, even if not willing to vote for it in public

  • neuromorph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 days ago

    For those paying attention. It ended when the FAA started to ground private planes due to staffing shortages.

    Those mega donors are the ones who pressured the vote. Not for the good of society. But because they started to get inconvenienced.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Even if your Democratic senator didn’t vote for this, call them up and call them out for allowing the spinless democrats to once again get fucked by Republicans for nothing.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      But they are not the same trust me bro. It is not all performative politics with no real impact. Democrats will save us trust me bro. One more lawsuit bro. One more vote and we defeat facism I promise.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I can’t wait to see the form letter full of platitudes I receive in response from both of my senators about thsi

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Schumer coordinated the Yes vote among Democrats

      You also missed King

      It wasn’t on the Senate website yet when I posted

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Schumer coordinated the Yes vote among Democrats

        Citation missing?

        You also missed King

        According to the website

        King (I-ME)

        King isn’t a Democrat.

        wasn’t on the Senate website yet

        Fair. Still, where did the other names come from?

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Me looking at cspan screenshot during the vote.

          And there is no way Schumer wasn’t coordinating this; he held a caucus meeting right beforehand, and the Yea votes were all Democrats who have 4+ years to their next election

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            cspan screenshot during the vote

            From this Senate vote & video?

            And there is no way Schumer wasn’t coordinating this; he held a caucus meeting right beforehand, and the Yea votes were all Democrats who have 4+ years to their next election

            So…citation missing & speculation conflicting their no vote & statement in the CSPAN post?

            While you clearly know how to edit a post, you still haven’t corrected it. Why are you doing this?

            • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Yeah, this is absurd, who are all the accounts voting him up when the misinformation he posted isn’t correct and he isn’t even bothering to edit it? It’s would be so easy to correct to, he just needs to put notes on why they should be included. Here, I’ll do it for him:

              Democrats who voted yes:

              • Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.)
              • Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.)
              • Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.)
              • Tim Kaine (D-Va.)
              • Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)
              • Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.)
              • Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.)

              Additionally:

              • Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) - Independent who caucuses with Democrats, voted yes.
              • Schumer - Voted no but is getting blamed for being ineffective as Senate Democratic. He had dropped a counter-offer to Republicans to end the shutdown to get assurances regarding Obamacare which they rejected.

              Completely wrong about Gillibrand, it’s simply a flat out lie that he voted yes. He joined in along with Schumer on the counter-offer, but the Republicans did not agree to that and this is not what this vote was. A lot of people are mad at their attempts to reach bipartisan compromise, but even though that’s probably where a lot of the claims that they negotiated a “yes” vote are coming from, that was still something that needed to make the rounds again back at the House and had nothing to do with this vote.

              Personally, I think Schumer is getting blamed as a escape goat, he doesn’t hold a magic stick that can force other democrats to vote like they did. US parties are basically more of an alignment towards certain groups of lobbyists than what other countries would consider political parties. What likely did so was money, influence, and power, the US has been an oligarchy for quite some time now.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I emailed mine last week, begging them to hold the line. As usual, spineless fucking cowards.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hes not your enemy. If you’re a constituent, he is your employee. Give his office a call and let them know how you expect him to perform.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      He is a disgrace and a disappointment. But, who was he running against? Oz. Oz didn’t even live in the state who and was more pro-Trump than Fetterman the time. So, the choice was between overtly pro-Trump Oz who was living in New Jersey or Pa-living Fetterman who wasn’t overtly pro-Trump until after the stroke.

  • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    8 days ago

    You mean these Dems are in cahoots with the GOP. There’s no fucking reason why to back down now when the pressure is on unless their handlers are telling them to.

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      TBH I think they are weighing the pain to their constituents of losing ACA benefits, versus shutting down air travel and tens of millions of hungry families.

      It’s pure evil but it’s MAGA

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, but caving will still continue the decline. There is nothing to gain unless they make a deal with something to gain.

        Like ACA.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hate the Democrats so so much. They never fight. Every time it looks like they might fight, it turns out that they’re not fighting. Their relentless cowardice is why we have trump and the fascists dismantling everything and hurting people.

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Vote for the lesser evil”

      But why vote for the lesser evil if the lesser evil will vote with the greater evil anyway?

      • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Vote in the primaries. Get involved in local politics and find out who actually wants to help people, has good ideas, and has a proven track record in their community.

        Elect the good leaders in your kid’s PTO to the school board. Get to know your local scout council (both boy scouts and girl scouts), elect them to your city council. Follow your school board, city and county council, see what they are doing, who is actually helping the community with good ideas, and then send them to the state house, demand they continue to fight for the people. The good ones in your state house should go to the Capitol for no more than 3 terms, then they can come back to the state house to be the local senior leaders.

        The problem is, no one does that first part where they pay attention to the local stuff, demanding local change and building local leaders and helping to ensure our candidates aren’t evil.

        • Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          As sad as it sounds, the race for President doesn’t seem to have the greatest impact on American lives.

          The Democratic Primaries are where people should be focusing their efforts.

          • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            democrats will just move the goal posts in the primaries or run an additional 15 establishment candidates to split the vote and ensure nobody but the establishment ever wins. It’s what they did to bernie.

            they say not to vote 3rd party because it will “split the vote” but it’s just projection. It’s what they would do.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s why Cuomo ran as an independent when he didn’t win the nomination, and most were unwilling to back the actual nominee until the day of the election.

              They will ratfuck you then wonder why no one likes them.

          • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Not just the primaries! My city is pretty purple. We tend to vote republican by a slim majority in larger races (think 51/49), but in the mayor and city council race that just happened, the republican mayor won at like 66/33. Vote every chance or you cede your power to the people who do.

            The fix is to start local. Bob’s right: that school PTO experience will be on the candidate’s bio when they run for mayor, even if they are the karen-est karen, and it will sway a few people. That ® mayor has power over a huge amount of how the city is run and many of the things people are locally unhappy with are a direct result of them electing a rich asshole. If we elect Dems locally, we might be able to sway people to our side when the situation gets better under our leadership.

            We individuals have the power but it’s got a bit of a lag-time to it. Become informed about how the DNC structure works (best done by joining your local precinct, even if you do nothing more than joining a few meetings). The precincts vote for who runs the county, the counties vote for who runs the state, the states vote for the nation and it’s all based on head-count of participants: a large precinct by population might only have a relative few people engaged and will not have as large an impact when voting in upstream elections. If we’re mad at DNC leadership or the options we have for congress/president, the fix is to ensure people at the precinct-level are the right ones.

            This comment is a direct response to anyone saying “both sides”, “dem’s are still corporate shills”, or similar defeatist comments. The “spineless dems” currently have power at the top of the party, but we can fix that. It will take work. It will require time, and that time will be hard to justify with little immediate result. This is the battle we need to fight right now, though. It just needs to be constant and not only complaining online and voting every 2-4 years.

    • xyzzy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I get it. But this is a handful of senators. Everyone else said no. House Democrats are vowing to say no, even Jeffries.

        • xyzzy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          My point isn’t passing the legislation, it’s that most Democrats seem to be opposed to this. Most Senate Democrats flipped out when they learned about this secret deal, and Jeffries issued a preemptive statement. It could all be an act (particularly Jeffries), but I do suspect a lot of them really are just as pissed as we are.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Pissed does not help your joke of a nation. This was surrender, and now this administration will push harder.

    • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      60
      ·
      7 days ago

      [Trump destroys America]

      This was all the democrats fault!!!

      Man. Every day, I see less and less difference between the far left and MAGA.

      • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Man. Every day, I see less and less difference between the fat left and MAGA.

        Probably need to get your lenses checked, because how you took that comment speaks a lot to how you see things and it sounds like you need a new prescription. This is a post about Democrats caving to the GOP once again, so the comment fits the context.

        Are they wrong in stating that the cowardice and unwillingness of Democrats to put up a real fight for the average person paved the way for not one but two Trump presidencies? Trump is a symptom.

        • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          7 days ago

          I took that comment exactly as it was stated:

          Trump fucked America, and apparently… lol- it’s somehow the democrats fault. It’s laughable logic at best and definitely shouldn’t be taken seriously.

          • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Alright, enjoy demonizing your allies because your views are so binary. You’re just as much of a hindrance to the leftist movement as the people you complain about.

            I’m not sure how to simplify it further for you. It’s not the fault of the Democrats, but they’re partially responsible. It’s entirely fair to call them out for doing it again.

            If someone comes to your door and says “let me in I’m going to rob you”, and you say “no” but don’t close the door, lock the door, or do anything to stop them (similar to the performative opposition we see from the Democrats) do you bare no responsibility for the outcome? Sure, you’re not the robber, but you were warned and didn’t do anything.

            You seem to think criticism of the Democrats = someone saying they’re Fascists just like the Republicans. Sure, that idea is out there, but now you’re just painting everybody with that brush. You and MAGA seem to share more similarities than you think.

            • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              27
              ·
              7 days ago

              ROFL…

              Ya gotta love the polarized ideology of the typical lemmy denizen. I’ll eat my shoes the day one of you show even a rudimentary understanding of the concept of nuance.

              And if you aren’t rewriting the points of others to argue against- you’re not saying anything at all.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    8 days ago

    These spineless Democrats do not need to cave. The GOP can end the shutdown anytime they want.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Moderate Democrats know the filibuster is a powerful tool for stopping progressive legislation, and if Republicans nuke it to end the shutdown, they have one less excuse.

      • rafoix@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The GOP can remove the filibuster and the DNC can put it back in the second they’re back in power. It has no value to the DNC right now if they cave.

        • Scirocco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Or rather, a Democratic majority Congress could USE that power to fix some things, and then shelve it.

          Would they actually do that? X•doubt

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          🤣 This would be such a DNC thing to do.

          Republicans remove the filibuster and ram through a bunch of vile shit.

          People revolt and vote in Democrats.

          Democrats, citing the need for decorum and bi-partisanship put back the filibuster.

          Republicans block any progress on anything useful.

          People are mad and vote in Republicans.

          And round and round we go…

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      People are acting like it’s total capitulation. It’s not. Per NYT :

      The spending package would, however, reject some of Mr. Trump’s spending proposals. While he has moved to eliminate the Food for Peace program, which sends surplus American crops to communities around the world that are experiencing famine and starvation, the bill would provide $1.2 billion for the program, which many Republicans hailing from farm states have championed.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s absolutely 1000% unacceptable unless the Republicans get nothing they’ve tried to extort and make some additional concessions on top of it. That’s what a compromise is, not letting the fucking thieves and saboteurs get away with half their goddamn crimes!

      • fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Trans people lose ALL their healthcare. For my family, these democrats helped the GOP kill them. These concessions are WORSE THAN NOTHING

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    8 days ago

    Why the fuck did they start offering concessions and bargaining after they swept the state elections last week?

    More evidence that moderates are not allies and are just as fearful of a leftward popular swing as the Republicans are.