cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/35742052

An Arizona federal court issued extensive sanctions against attorney Maren Bam on August 14, 2025, after finding that her brief contained multiple artificial intelligence-generated citations to non-existent cases. The sanctions include revocation of pro hac vice status, striking the brief, and mandatory notification to state bar authorities.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How naïve it was of me, to think that the New York Avianca case in 2023 was high profile enough for lawyers to have learnt their lesson, but nope, it’s getting worse each and every month that goes by:

    https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/

    It doesn’t help that the most common outcomes there are “Warning” or a fine in the low thousands. If a legal practice can save $500,000 a year on avoiding doing their own research, and the worse that’s likely to happen is “Warning” or a $2,000 fine, then why would they not?

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How are they not immediately disbarred for this? Surely fabricating documents and citations gets you disbarred right?

      • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It doesnt, but it should. Its malpractice of the highest degree and shows clear disregard for properly representing a client