Read the article, her point is that if Trump could use his infamous deal making power to get Russia out of Ukraine without ceding any Ukrainian territory, then that would be a large enough achievement that she, personally, would nominate him.
But she says it because she strongly suspects it would never happen. Trump will never stand up to Putin, and will have no problem selling our Ukraine in any peace settlement.
Oh I know, I thought it was hilarious. She knew he was going to get owned at the meeting. He also didn’t know how to respond when he heard she said that, lol.
Read the article, her point is that if Trump could use his infamous deal making power to get Russia out of Ukraine without ceding any Ukrainian territory, then that would be a large enough achievement that she, personally, would nominate him.
But she says it because she strongly suspects it would never happen. Trump will never stand up to Putin, and will have no problem selling our Ukraine in any peace settlement.
It would never happen, because so far everything he did his first term and this 7 months benefited the Russia.
But if he would do it, why not? That would actually finally be something worth of a nomination.
Somewhat related, but this is a great roast related to his desire of having a Nobel peace prize by India:
https://youtu.be/gO_OE5G-R_E
Oh I know, I thought it was hilarious. She knew he was going to get owned at the meeting. He also didn’t know how to respond when he heard she said that, lol.
Wow what an insight she had, not everyone else on earth thought trump would epically fail at peace negotiations. /S
Then he’d need to offer something of equal or greater value. So… Alaska? Idfk.
Trump’s deals have enriched himself, consistently. This isn’t any different.