• NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago
    1. It’s theft to digital artisans, as AI-generated works tend to derive heavily without even due credit.
    2. It further discourages what’s called critical thinking.
    3. It’s putting even technically competent people out of work.
    4. It’s grift for and by techbros.
    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Numver 3 is crazy too because it’s putting people out of work even when it’s worse than them, the bubble bursting will have dire consequences and if it’s held together by corrupt injections of taxpayer money then it’ll still have awful consequences, and the whole point of AI doing our jobs was to free us from labour but instead the lack of jobs is only hurting people.

    • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago
      1. It’s not theft
      2. PEBKAC problem.
      3. totally agree. This right here is what we should be worried about.
      4. yep, absolutely. But we need to be figuring out what to do when all the jobs go away.
      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago
        1. If vanilla ice takes 6 notes from the base line from a queen song it’s theft and costs $4mio. If AI copies whole chapters of books it’s all fine.
        2. No. PEBKAC is if it affects one person, or maybe a handful of people. If it affects whole sections of the population it’s systematic. It’s like saying “poverty is an user error because everyone could just choose to be rich”.