• Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Wellllll… In principle verification is not in itself an endorsement by the platform
    In principle platforms should verify government entities, given sufficent documentation

    In practice, I don’t fucking care, abolish ICE, fuck everyone who bows to them, platforms aren’t obligated to be the mouthpieces of clearly fascist governments

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      In principle platforms should verify government entities, given sufficent documentation

      Why?

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, you can’t really have accounts, pretending to be the president of the US, making joke tweets, and having people believe them. In that sense, verification is reasonable.

        But yeah, Bluesky shouldn’t be letting these freaks anywhere near their platform

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I say verify ‘em and then ban ‘em. “This is the real account, and it can really fuck off.”

      • Rose@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If the platforms are (or pretend to be) politically neutral, then that’s what they should do - just make sure the accounts that are being created are what they’re being purported to be.

        As I said, that’s bare minimum. Next comes a lot of risk mitigation. Some common sense risk mitigation.