destructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 24 hours agoWikipedia is one of the last genuine places on the Internet, and these rat bastards are trying to contaminate that, toolemmy.worldimagemessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1694arrow-down19
arrow-up1685arrow-down1imageWikipedia is one of the last genuine places on the Internet, and these rat bastards are trying to contaminate that, toolemmy.worlddestructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 24 hours agomessage-square124linkfedilink
minus-squareudon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·18 hours agoHow exactly does that work? Wikipedia does not “own” the content on the website, it’s all CC-BY licensed.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 hours agoYeah, they’re selling the work of others. That’s how the site always worked. This venture into “AI” is nothing new.
minus-squareWillow@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·18 hours agoThe BY term is not respected by LLMs
minus-squareudon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoSo? Still doesn’t make sense to me that wikipedia can sell anything meaningful here, but I’m also not a lawyer. Do they promise not to sue them or sell them some guarantee that contributors also can’t sue them? Is it just some symbolic PR washing?
How exactly does that work? Wikipedia does not “own” the content on the website, it’s all CC-BY licensed.
Yeah, they’re selling the work of others. That’s how the site always worked. This venture into “AI” is nothing new.
The BY term is not respected by LLMs
So? Still doesn’t make sense to me that wikipedia can sell anything meaningful here, but I’m also not a lawyer. Do they promise not to sue them or sell them some guarantee that contributors also can’t sue them? Is it just some symbolic PR washing?