• arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    They shouldn’t necessarily pay taxes, but should no longer have a special tax designation. They should be placed in the same category as other not for profit social clubs. Think groups like Shriners, Mason’s, a community operated community center.

    I’m not well versed in tax law so maybe that would mean paying some property taxes. But it places them on the same level and removes many of thei special privileges

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some of them sell services and merchandise. Look up Joel Scott Osteen, dude has mansions and giant “megachurches”.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am very familiar, but pretty much everything that allows him to embezzle that much money comes special rules that apply to churches and “ministers”.

        If it were a normal social club the rules would change.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well yes but then every church would have a different tax filing status based on its operations and scale, or in other words “they should have to pay taxes.”

          Differences without distinction.