As the Liberals have shifted rightward—not just on immigration but also on military spending, climate policy, and public safety—the federal Conservative leader appears to have gone looking for an issue on which to distinguish himself. He is now signalling that scapegoating immigrants and people seeking asylum will be central to that plan.

Poilievre’s allies in think tanks, lobby firms, and the media think he’s found a winning strategy. In the wake of Poilievre’s defeat in the last election, former Conservative staffer Josie Sabatino described it as a “new era” in which Poilievre can “move beyond the risk-averse messaging of a campaign.” National Post columnist Geoff Russ called it “a once-in-a-generation opportunity to finally turn immigration into an issue our politicians can openly and honestly debate.” Conservative activist Amy Hamm declared that the days of labelling Conservatives as racist for their views on immigration have passed.

Anti-immigrant sentiments will only grow the more immigrants are falsely blamed for problems in housing, health care and unemployment—all of which are better explained by the policies of austerity-loving politicians and the corporate class. None of these dynamics are new in Canada, but they are likely to grow with more oxygen from federal Conservatives.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I honestly can’t see how people defend the TFW program

    How it was originally intended (for attracting specialized skill professionals who are not available in the local economy) is defensible, but what it has been expanded to become and how far too many employers abuse it is not defensible.

    • healthetank@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      For sure - I know the original intention was to try and bring in specialized workers we don’t have here. But IMO, that encourages wage suppression and hiring from outside rather than training.

      Its a useful stopgap tool, but it always should have had a requirement of training an alternate candidate or showing some other longterm solution beyond permanent use of the TFW program.

      And, like you said, definitely not intended for its use the way it has been now.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sooo we needed a million e-bike delivery people living 12 to a room in Brampton to keep the economy afloat? What’s skilled about that?