I wouldnt call the technology that is using 1.9 billion liters of water a year, or is causing severe respitory problems for poor people something that is making anyones lives easier. Unless you want to make the corpos who want to sell water and the insurance companies richer. Why you’re relating a known fallacy to US/Chinese imperialism I have no fuckin clue. It was also nice of you to conveintly not say anything about AI actually giving back to people, and not large scale conglomerates.
AI could’ve been responsible, and could’ve been ethical. It wasnt, it isnt. Until it is I will continue to call out when its used.
Should have started with those arguments because they are the good ones. Or how it’s being shoehorned into many areas where it’s not wanted and likely is there to help improve and disguise data collection. Or how some AI owners are trying to use some of that money to create a computing monopoly to remove alternative options to those unwanted AI-laden products and let them do our computing for us.
Making jobs obsolete is just what tech does over time. Our economic system is more the issue here and makes these things into a problem in the first place. It did if before AI was a thing, what with all the extra productivity without associated wage gains.
Your first reply come off as pro-AI. If you are pro-AI the chances of you being anticapitalist is almost 0. I went with the argument that would’ve appealed to a pro-capitalist knobend. It would make no sense to bring up poor people or environmental issues to a capitalist.
I wouldnt call the technology that is using 1.9 billion liters of water a year, or is causing severe respitory problems for poor people something that is making anyones lives easier. Unless you want to make the corpos who want to sell water and the insurance companies richer. Why you’re relating a known fallacy to US/Chinese imperialism I have no fuckin clue. It was also nice of you to conveintly not say anything about AI actually giving back to people, and not large scale conglomerates.
AI could’ve been responsible, and could’ve been ethical. It wasnt, it isnt. Until it is I will continue to call out when its used.
Should have started with those arguments because they are the good ones. Or how it’s being shoehorned into many areas where it’s not wanted and likely is there to help improve and disguise data collection. Or how some AI owners are trying to use some of that money to create a computing monopoly to remove alternative options to those unwanted AI-laden products and let them do our computing for us.
Making jobs obsolete is just what tech does over time. Our economic system is more the issue here and makes these things into a problem in the first place. It did if before AI was a thing, what with all the extra productivity without associated wage gains.
Your first reply come off as pro-AI. If you are pro-AI the chances of you being anticapitalist is almost 0. I went with the argument that would’ve appealed to a pro-capitalist knobend. It would make no sense to bring up poor people or environmental issues to a capitalist.