• maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The problem is the Liberals put no clause in to deal with this situation. They cant retroactively make a law against their own stupidity for signing a bad contract, the best they can do is arbitrarily punish them, sending the signal we operate our country not by laws but like North Korea. Companies would need to factor that into their risk metrics.

    • fourish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Aww. Baby cons are butt hurt.

      Maybe time for a good round of fuck Trudeau? lol.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is the Liberals put no clause in to deal with this situation.

      of course they did. No one gets federal money without audits and milestones. Focus back on haircuts and socks, because you have no idea how these deal work.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seeing as neither of us know the details, we’ll see.

      But if the money was given to invest here, and they withdraw their investments, even without a specific penalty clause that can be breach of contract and have damages.

    • pubquiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      WTFF is this screed? A deal signed before the naziamerican diaper shitter came back? Does our liddle con man have some hurt fee-fees because there was no clause written in for every possible eventuality?

      Go emigrate, ungrate.