• hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I think we put in speed bumps a few years ago due to an employee complaint about speeding. I hate whoever suggested that. Not because people weren’t speeding/ riding tails, but now half the people drive 10 MPH going over 20 MPH speed bumps.

    In reality we’ve had a lot of good things due to suggestions over the years.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      Speed bumps now are designed to make SUVs do 20. I don’t have an SUV, I can’t do 20 over them!

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s actually the big trucks and jeeps that take them the slowest, or the stupidly lowered cars. I take them fine in a crossover and have coworkers that do fine in priuses and other sedans.

      • Doom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Meanwhile in my jeep, “what speedbumps?”

        It’s almost as if speedbumps are stupid. If they really wanted to address speeding traffic calming designs would have done it better and been prettier to look at.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Seriously though, lane narrowing is more effective at speed reduction and traffic calming than speed bumps. Both, even, are better for particularly stubborn stretches of road.

            This does a much better job at reducing car speeds, and it is also vehicle size agnostic. People on SUVs feel far more threatened by narrowing lanes and will absolutely slow down. While they will plow through a speed bump because they can’t feel them with their emotional support tank’s suspension.