• ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I would argue this isn’t only a bad thing though. Even before AI, many bogus articles and information existed. Eg. that people swallow spiders in their sleep, which many outlets parroted.

    I would guess most people never checked (m)any sources on most information they found so long as the ‘vibe’ felt trustworthy. There is no cure to make reality simple, and the more pressure we have to teach people to think critically, the better.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago
      1. AI is much better at creating internet spam.
      2. AI is a vector for even reputable places to “set and forget” any article they’re in charge of. Any mistruths are simply ‘glitches’.
      3. The pressure on people to think critically only matters if people actually start thinking critically. Kids use this technology to skip their homework.
      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        No disagreement here. I’m simply saying because you are more likely to be misled now than ever, being lazy about it isn’t an option anymore, and teachers can use that fact to drive the point home stronger. In the past if you were lazy about checking sources and verifying information, chances were much higher you still got somewhat valid information that didn’t harm your life down the road. Now you might just hurt yourself by putting glue on your pizza. Not saying I desire that, but the consequences of intellectual laziness have never been bigger, so the emphasis on teaching understanding must match that, since the alternative is being taken advantage of.

        #3 is very important, as this is the core thing a school should teach. But lets not kid ourselves that kids weren’t cheating their way out of homework since the start of time 😄

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But lets not kid ourselves that kids weren’t cheating their way out of homework since the start of time 😄

          I don’t mean to come off as too aggressive because I don’t think we’re really arguing with each other. But, I tend to see statements like this as a kind of handwaving apologia for something that, to be clear, real people are doing to us on purpose. The same way that people might lament the coming of a hurricane season; nothing really to be done about it.

          • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It can certainly be used for that, I will admit. But no that isn’t my intention. I hear many good stories on that front of teachers that have gotten a really good nose for AI and are using it as learning moments for their students. The world is filled with ways to cheat, and teachers are well aware of that. In the end, the process to unlearn them from cheating with AI is the same as cheating in conventional manners, is all I’m saying.