Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.

  • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you’re not qualified to have opinions on art in general.

    “At this point, the only thing that makes money is garbage. It’s just fascinating. It makes a fortune, and that’s the bottom line,”

    "writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

    -Charlie Kaufman

    https://deadline.com/2023/08/charlie-kaufman-ai-wga-strike-hollywood-sarajevo-1235498089/

    spoiler

    You’re probably one of the people that enjoys cookie-cutter art which is why you get defensive when someone says AI can make it.

    • tortina_original@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not sure at what point will you realize that what you quoted/said has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.

      Probably never.

      • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most “artists” because most “art” is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

        "writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

        Learn to read.

        • atomicorange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Could you define what you mean when you say the word “art”? I think this may be a semantic disagreement. I think the people you’re arguing with are using a definition similar to “human creative expression” while you seem to mean something different.