• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hm… Come to think of it…

    Fact #1: Microsoft claims their codebase is now 30% AI-generated.

    Fact #2: US courts are in pretty unanimous agreement that AI generated material cannot be copyrighted.

    So… What percentage of AI-generated code does Microslop need to reach before their software copyrights become unenforceable?

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The article used the word “Microslop” thirteen times. I guess the author really wants search engines and bots to associate “Microslop” with “Microsoft”. Apparently Microslop is a term for Microsoft products, or perhaps even Microslop is an intrinsic property of Microsoft.

    …'kay, I’ll stop it now.

    It’s rather curious how MS babbles so much about “AI”, but its Discord server uses such a simple filter that can be evaded by 0N3 0F 7H3 0LD357 700L5 0F 7H3 1N73RN37 5H17P0573R one of the oldest tools of the internet shitposter: leetspeak. It’s almost like it knows it’s selling a dud.

    Also, I guess this thing run so far they don’t even care about the Streisand effect any more.

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Lol, and that is such a mild form of criticism… To nuke their whole Discord over it. On the other hand, I guess nothing of value was lost