• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    As I said elsewhere:

    Every socialist state that has ever existed has been, contextually, far better than what came before it, and in instances where socialism dissolved, better than what replaced it, for the working classes.

    This is true for all of these. What’s also important is analyzing context, life expectancy doubled in both Russia and China thanks to the lives saved by socialism. Cuba has, in many years, a higher life expectancy than the US Empire. On the whole, there may be states where quality of life is higher for the working classes, but these are exclusively imperialist states that subsidize their safety nets with the spoils of plundering the global south, and is why these same countries are surging to the far-right as imperialism is decaying.

    • Riverside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Edit: replied to the wrong comment lmao

      I’d say that all of these sucked to live in

      And you’d be wrong to say so. Polls in most post-communist states (except some exceptionally right wing nationalist regimes such as the Baltics or Poland) clearly tell us that most people preferred living under socialism.

      When talking about the effects of socialism, we need to compare with what came before or after. And what came after was horrifying: