Here is a link to learn more about the bill.

It is also important to note this legislation also includes language for ongoing, real-time monitoring. Not just verification

Here is a summary from the link shared above:

Requires manufacturers of internet-enabled devices to conduct age assurance to determine a user’s age category and provide all websites, online services, online applications and mobile applications on such user’s internet-enabled device and/or application store manufactured by the covered manufacturer with a digital signal that such user is a covered minor as well as the age category of such covered minor via a real-time application programming interface (API).

I love the inclusion of the API acronym; all super serious sounding. Like these dumb pedophiles even know what an API is!

You are encouraged to have an opinion about this. It is obvious what is happening here.

Do you have the spine to be remembered?

We are at an epic turning point in human history. Those who rise to meet that standard are today’s heroes.

The real world, filled with everyday people, needs individuals who embody a willingness to say “Get fucked!

If this is your first time learning about heroics, look up information about the “hero’s journey”. Also known as the “monomyth”.

It’s okay to be new. What isn’t okay is to sit on the sidelines in today’s world.

You are alive today. Take full advantage of it.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yep, California and Colorado are honestly not horrible laws. New York’s here is horseshit, and every citizen should be screaming at their senators and representatives extremely loudly about this in New York. If you aren’t, you’re okay with them.

    New York’s requires

    Covered manufacturer… determined via one or more commercially reasonable age assurance methods…

    This is biometric scanning, ID checks, whatever. California’s only requires there exists a way to create a child account, and mark it as “child”. New York’s is MASSIVELY worse. People, call your senators, kill this bill in committee NOW

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m going to disagree with you there. They are all horrible, unnecessary, intrusive laws specifically designed to enhance the ability to surveil everyone online. These laws can get fucked along with everyone that supports them.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I won’t argue if people want to push back against Colorado/California laws. Personally, I think attestation is okay. I think Meta is trying to get out of paying fines for children, but overall it’s not a bad idea in my book to label the account as a child’s account. That’s my opinion though.

        New York’s I will fight vehemently against, and I’m ready to start donating to those who are there fighting it. Fuck needing an ID to use a computer. Absolutely un-American and anti-free speech from it’s core.

        • just2look@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m fine if companies want to set up the ability to create child accounts. I should not be legally required to disclose private information to exist online. There is already a disgusting amount of surveillance and theft of private information that happens, and we should be doing more to protect everyone’s personal data. Instead we are giving bad actors more tools to gather that data.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That’s basically the difference, and it’s an important difference. CA/CO only require attestation. As an adult, you have the ability to create a child’s account, which is a simple flag which can be used by browsers to say that this account is under aged. The adult is attesting that it is a child. They can make it anything.

            NY is a whole different thing. They are requiring verification, as in the OS must check ID, facial scan, something against a third party to let you use your own computer, which then will set the boolean flag. Of course, most 3rd party online checkers will keep all info about you, so you basically lost all privacy right there.

            • just2look@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              55 minutes ago

              It is still requiring my OS to push an identifying flag to literally anyone that asks. I want to give less info, not more. I already think that the digital landscape overshares data. The more data can be requested, the simpler it is to digitally fingerprint. So I still do not want it to be part of my OS.

              If the individual app/program/website wants to ask for age during account setup, that’s fine since there is the expectation of some data sharing to create am account. It should not be part of my device/OS.