Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That’s funny, not long ago people were giving me shit for saying Lutris is a confusing, unintuitive mess.

    Well I guess now we know why.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      No, it was a confusing intuitive mess with tons of broken toggles for legacy cruft long, long before AI code was a thing.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        True, but if AI is doing much of the coding, that means the devs have been out to lunch for a while, aka, not actually trying to do the much needed overhaul to the frontend UX.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, they were out to lunch before they used AI. Sounds like Lutris was always slop, it’s too bad there isn’t a better alternative.

    • fleck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Unfortunately, it is the only way my SO got paint tool SAI 2 with pen pressure working under Linux…

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Well that certainly is an edge case scenario.

        I would hazard a guess that it … should be possible to get it working through another way of setting up WINE/Proton, if you can get all the dependencies and specifics figured out… maybe via Bottles?

        But, figuring all that out would be a hassle, and may just end up not working.

        I mean, if it works, it works.

        The closest thing to that that I can say is that via RetroDeck on Bazzite, on a Steam Deck, I literally accidentally discovered that the touch screen controls for that worked just fine, without me doing anything beyond normal RetroDeck setup.

        Just got annoyed, assuming that I couldn’t use a DS/3DS second screen as a touch screen, ‘Boy I sure with is could just-’ … and then I poked it, and then it worked.

        But thats probably a different ballpark than getting an windows program to play nice with a linux touch/pad/stylus.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Heroic is best for PC games from GOG, and Epic and Amazon I suppose. Got quite a stock of free games from Epic that I’ve never bothered to start up.

        Lutris did fill a hole for ‘emulation’, all your console games, dosbox &c all in one place. Heroic doesn’t really do that. Looks like it’s time to find another tool that will…

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I have not used Heroic much at all, but from what I have used it for… yeah, much more intuitive user interface for the vast majority of the most common use cases.

      • Jiral@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Heroic is great for newer stuff but I still have Lutris because some older games work there out of the nox just fine while they don’t even launch in Heroic.