Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

  • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    LLMs also aren’t good at replacing junior programmers, but the people in charge believe that they can do that too.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      well they are, in that they produce bad code that has to be vetted thoroughly and they don’t know git.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It doesn’t take that long to reach a junior dev basic Git, and they can often explain their bad code. Plus, junior devs turn into senior devs, and LLMs don’t.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          junior devs don’t turn into senior devs if they’re replaced with llms though :(