This careless interpretation (if you can even call it that) completely misrepresents the meaning of the original work. It represents the idea of using a delicate touch to handle something with the idea of punching it like a child would instead. As another song by them put it:

“Don’t feed the people

But we feed the machines”

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The music is the content, not the image. The image isn’t the thing generating ad revenue. You guys are tripping over a placeholder image, made by the guy that did all their album artwork and played keyboard on some of their songs on top of that.

      It was this or a static image of their album cover (both of which are made by the same guy, so it’s not like they are screwing over their album artist either).

      We don’t even know to what extent AI was used, if he generated the whole thing or just animated it with it. It might not be AI at all.

      And having ad revenue doesn’t make everything on YouTube a cash grab, nor is it a cash grab the moment it includes AI.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Two of them appear to be different remasters but fair point, could easily be classified as a cash grab in some measure, although it’s hard to apply that label to free content for me.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The music is the content, not the image

        You initially said it was put up for free as a way to excuse it, now that I pointed out they’re making money it’s fine because the image isn’t what people come there for? In that case why use an AI image to begin with?

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The music is the content and what is up for free. The image has little to do with the cash grab or ad revenue aspect of it. Free for us doesn’t mean they won’t make a tiny profit. I fail to see how I’m contradicting myself.

          Why not use an AI animation. It literally just makes for a better visualizer.