This careless interpretation (if you can even call it that) completely misrepresents the meaning of the original work. It represents the idea of using a delicate touch to handle something with the idea of punching it like a child would instead. As another song by them put it:

“Don’t feed the people

But we feed the machines”

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Could just be a different interpretation. Like not all gloves are boxing gloves, yet no one’s mentioning that. Plus they’re brown in the picture, so maybe they’re made out of goat leather anyway.

      If it’s not AI I don’t think there’s much valid criticism of an artist not using every phrase literally.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Possibly?

      TBH, I’ve never really thought about the reference much. But if someone asked me yesterday before I read another comment on this thread explaining it …

      I very well may have guessed a kid wearing gloves.