Related:

This is in a PR where Shougo, another long-time contributor, communicates entirely in walls of unparseable AI slop text: https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/19413

Thank you for the detailed feedback! I’ve addressed all the issues:

Thank you for the feedback! I agree that following the Vim 8+ naming convention makes sense.

Thank you for the feedback on naming!

Thanks for the suggestion! After thinking about this more, I believe repeat_set() / repeat_get() is the right choice:

Thank you for the feedback. A brief clarification.

https://hachyderm.io/@AndrewRadev/116176001750596207

@AndrewRadev@hachyderm.io

  • gaiety@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    2·
    8 hours ago

    honestly, an amazing and respectable answer with solid reasoning

    up to you if you’d like to add a footnote, either way I’m rooting for you this is good stuff

    • hperrin@lemmy.caEnglish
      1·
      5 hours ago

      I added several quotes from the copyright office’s guidance that show their specific usage of the term “human authorship” to the More Information section. :)

      One interesting thing is that they explicitly say that a work that is “authored by non-human spiritual beings” can only qualify for copyright protection if there is “human selection and arrangement of the revelations”, and even then, only the compilation is copyrighted, not the “divine messages”.