• stray@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I’m having trouble imagining how this makes anything more difficult than a traditional password setup. Can you please explain?

      I know there’s issues surrounding its use, but solving those issues involves changing other policies, not getting rid of e-identification. For example, allowing someone to access their medical records in person instead of demanding they use the website, a problem which would persist with a username and password.

      • toad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I recently got back to my country. They have e-id. I opened an account. Got paid. My phone broke. Signing up to the app requires a computer with an e-id reader. I use it once every couple of years. It took me ages to find one. Only to realize the stupid browser extension wasn’t working with linux. At the end I had to go to the stupid city hall. I’m disabled. I would rather use my personal passphrase. What seems easy to you may not be for everybody. I hate it here. Everything is bureaucratic, security first so that the already rich banker doesn’t loose 20 euros to fraudster, nothing it adapted, everything is loud and complicated and annoying.

        • stray@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          I hope I haven’t given the impression that I don’t take your experience seriously. I only ask questions to understand things better.

          Would having the option to use a personal passphrase in lieu of the usual e-id solve your problem entirely, or would further measures be needed?