• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    22 hours ago

    You don’t have the right not to be filmed in public. Do you punch every person filming in public? and if you punch someone wearing the glasses, most likely they weren’t even recording.

    • srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You don’t have the right not to be filmed in public.

      Uhhhh, you actually do.* I am not sure if you know, but different places have different laws.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I am aware. If the yanks want to copy it then they should

        1. overthrow the orange turd
        2. campaign for it democratically

        not go around punching people for violating a legal right they do not have. Your discomfort at maybe having your picture doesn’t entitle you to violence.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      *Unless Facebook is the one doing the unreasonable search, and we simply buy their data

      most likely they weren’t even recording.

      Sweet summer child

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You didn’t answer the question. You could just have said that you’re overreacting because it’s tech associated with Meta and you don’t like them, even though it’s basically the same as a phone, just on your face.

        You think smart glasses have enough battery to record constantly? lol.

        • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          You mean you can’t tell the difference between someone visibly recording you and someone recording you with a hidden camera? You feel like both of those are the same thing?

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I feel like if the problem is being recorded, it doesn’t matter whether it’s done with a hidden or visible camera.

            I feel like if the problem is being secretly recorded, you should be just as mad at bags possibly being used to xonceal a recording phone as at these glasses.

    • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      If I see someone filming me, I ask them to stop. That will escalate if they don’t.

      I think what people are missing here is the intention. There’s generalised filming of your surroundings, surveillance cameras…these glasses are intended for use in a social capacity. That will move into privacy issues and perverted use.

      These peoples right to use these glasses, as far as I’m concerned, does not eclipse my privacy or lack of desire to be filmed and put on Metas platforms and if I find someone using them on me they’ll be fucking told.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Most likely either the glasses are in a state of recording, or the wearer has no idea what it’s doing. Damned! After so many scandals, people still assume Meta will do what it claims and not trick its users! Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me! Fool me 42 times, more, please MOOOOORE!

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A simple back-of-the-envelope calculation involving battery capacity and power consumption puts that idea to bed.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Recording from a camera consumes upwards of 1W on mobile platforms. With the ~160mAh battery in Ray Ban Meta smart glasses, the battery would last about 40 minutes, assuming they are doing nothing else. Given that the radio needs to be powered to upload that footage somewhere, and doing all this will keep the SoC in a higher wake state, that is a very optimistic upper bound.

            I’m sorry that you and everyone who downvoted me think that hating on Meta is more real than physics.