• Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Is that meant to be a “gotcha” or something?

      My point is, this is the last time I let google control my phone.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      yes but also no.

      google influenced, but not google controlled anymore.

    • SanctimoniousApe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I imagine since it’s not an official product of Google’s, it can’t legally be called “Android.” As such it’s something that is not Android, but is highly compatible with it since both are rooted in the AOSP.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Legally? Maybe not.

        But Col Sanders left KFC after selling a business he created with his own secret reciepe. Then after he sold it, he watched the new owners use his image to sell an inferior chicken product.

        So he started up another new chicken resteraunt using the original reciepe. Legally he couldn’t call it KFC, but that doesn’t change the fact that it was the original KFC reciepe.

        Hows that phrase go? A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet.

        Call things whatever word you want, it’s still the same thing in the end.