• underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    An init system does not need to know my personal details; it’s for starting programs in a specific order just fuck off with this shit. You don’t even have to capitulate to this stuff and these freaks are out here doing it preemptively like they expect a fucking pat on the head for being first in line to dive tongue first on to that boot.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Whatever the fuck it is it doesn’t need to know how old I am to do its job.

        • mcv@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It already has fields for personal information, though, and they’re every bit as sensitive as your birthdate. realName, emailAddress, location, and timezone are already in there. The important part is that they’re all optional, and you don’t have to fill them in at all, or can fill them in with fake data. The system still serves you, not some outside party.

          But the timing of it does have a lot of people freaking out about it.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I now fear it will one day be required for services on the internet (as it is by a rescent law in Calafornia). I want to make that less uikely, and more difficult to implement.

            Having a principle the majority do not have and refusing to participate means being another step further out of society.

        • AcornTickler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It doesn’t need to know your age. It just provides a way to take a note of your birth date, only if you want to. The system already has a place to write your name and home address. All are optional and practically nobody uses them.

        • Yttra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And it still doesn’t, the blank space does not need to be filled

        • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It doesn’t know how old are you, it just remembers a date you tell it. You can give your birthday, but you can choose any other day

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      tell me you have only a passing understanding of how modern linux is architected without telling me you have only a passing understanding of how modern linux is architected

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Enlighten us then. Why would an operating system management tool need to know the age of its user?

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Because it’s going to be a legal requirement, with fines of $7000 per affected underage user, which will instantly bankrupt the US-based non-profit representing Debian, Arch and others, and kill off community-maintained Linux.
          Do note: The legal requirement is NOT for age verification. Only for having a field where you as the admin can enter whatever the fuck you want.

          If you don’t agree with the law, good. Neither do I. But the devs aren’t the ones to apply pressure to, here.
          They’re forced to do this to keep the lights on, and they’ve implemented it in a way that keeps you as the admin in full control.

          • RibbidRabbid@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 hour ago
            1. Literally no one forced them to do that yet. They just decided to get on their knees preemptively and start licking boots

            2. Open source software has maintainers all around the world. Why the fuck would the rest of the world care about this fucked up law coming from ONE state?

            Again, no one is forced to do anything. And if I was a maintainer on FOSS where I would be forced to implement something like this, I would just stop contributing to that project.

            Fuck everyone going along with this state surveillance bullshit.

          • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Why doesn’t Debian do it instead of systemd? Let the distros decide on the plan of action, this is clearly not something that systemd has to decide. The people maintaining systemd are leveraging the fact that their shite software runs on more than 95% of Linux machines. That is an abuse of power. What is weird too is compliance ahead of time. Compliance ahead of time makes sense with cars, but software can be updated immediately when necessary.

      • BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Me too!

        Although someone (steam maybe? I don’t remember) updated their system and won’t take it anymore. So now it’s 1930-01-01.

        You should try it. It’s like I’m 30 years younger!

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Born just in time to not be able to be a nazi!

          Yes, I know the Hitler Youth existed…but I don’t hold that against those (at the time) children. They were being conditioned to support a system they didn’t understand.

          I figure anyone younger than 20 is too young to be blamed for all that crap. The brain stops developing at age 23. So I don’t expect an 8 year old to hold a very good grasp on international politics and wars. Especially in an age where an hour nightly AM radio broadcast, and a daily morning newspaper were your only source for news.

          • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 minutes ago

            The brain stops developing at age 23.

            No it doesn’t. The brain continues to develop and change throughout the lifetime of the organism.

  • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The contents of the field will be protected from modification except by users with root privileges.

    sudo my age to a thousand years then; no, thank you very very much

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    1930-01-01, done. But this shouldn’t be a requirement to begin with either.