You the one out here promoting conspiracy theory without evidence then telling people to “do their own reading”. You determine truth by how it makes you feel, emotionally, rather than based on what we have evidence for or a lack of evidence for. That’s what children and under-developed adults do.
Its also why we’re here; its why I drug you down deep into the thread where people will have to click through multiple threads to see whats going on: most wont bother.
Conspiratorial thinking is an emotional response to uncertainty. We as people don’t like living with not knowing; we’re not wired for it. We’d rather an emotionally pleasurable story rather than uncertainty.
But its really just laziness. There is no actual excuse for it.
Well thats rude. And granted, while we all do die alone, at least until the end I’ll have my partner in marriage, my supportive community, and my extensive friend group to get me through.
having achieved nothing of note.
Don’t tell my co-authors that. They’d be very disappointed to find out that none of the many, and honestly, surprisingly well cited publications we’ve been able get out into the world aren’t worthy of note.
Mischaracterizing what I’m saying to be some broad generalization about conspiracies doesn’t change the fact that the behavior you are engaging in is truly sinister. You know you have no evidence to support the article you submitted and yet you continue anyways. This is the kind of breach of the social contract that MAGA and right-wingers use to excuse their toxic destruction of the ties which bind. And you are not different, although I think you could be better than you show yourself to be here.
I have drawn you as soyjack, therefore I am the victor:
I don’t believe you published anything any human has read. Nor do I believe you tricked someone into marriage. You don’t come off as smart, you come off as a bing bang character or the autistic kid at the grocery store telling me about spaceX.
Prove me wrong. Link something you wrote. I bet it woln’t have anything to do with cybersecurity… Because I don’t think you’ll link anything, because you have no value.
The guy responding with quotes, paragraphs and images or the one on the shitter?
Idk. You seem pretty triggered. Maybe it has to do with how you engage emotionally with ideas instead of intellectually.
What emotion? What intellect? You’re a master debator lol. Your argument is circularly arguing conspiracies are bad mmmkay. Dropout.
You the one out here promoting conspiracy theory without evidence then telling people to “do their own reading”. You determine truth by how it makes you feel, emotionally, rather than based on what we have evidence for or a lack of evidence for. That’s what children and under-developed adults do.
Its also why we’re here; its why I drug you down deep into the thread where people will have to click through multiple threads to see whats going on: most wont bother.
Conspiratorial thinking is an emotional response to uncertainty. We as people don’t like living with not knowing; we’re not wired for it. We’d rather an emotionally pleasurable story rather than uncertainty.
But its really just laziness. There is no actual excuse for it.
Life must be hard being so severely autistic. Pro tip, don’t repeat yourself like this IRL, it’s one of the reasons people avoid you.
I mean as long as I’m stopping conspiracy dribbling saboteurs to the social contract, I think I’ll be all right.
All conspiracies are false is as intellectually lazy as all conspiracies are true.
Also you’re going to die alone having achieved nothing of note.
Well thats rude. And granted, while we all do die alone, at least until the end I’ll have my partner in marriage, my supportive community, and my extensive friend group to get me through.
Don’t tell my co-authors that. They’d be very disappointed to find out that none of the many, and honestly, surprisingly well cited publications we’ve been able get out into the world aren’t worthy of note.
Mischaracterizing what I’m saying to be some broad generalization about conspiracies doesn’t change the fact that the behavior you are engaging in is truly sinister. You know you have no evidence to support the article you submitted and yet you continue anyways. This is the kind of breach of the social contract that MAGA and right-wingers use to excuse their toxic destruction of the ties which bind. And you are not different, although I think you could be better than you show yourself to be here.
I have drawn you as soyjack, therefore I am the victor:
I don’t believe you published anything any human has read. Nor do I believe you tricked someone into marriage. You don’t come off as smart, you come off as a bing bang character or the autistic kid at the grocery store telling me about spaceX.
Prove me wrong. Link something you wrote. I bet it woln’t have anything to do with cybersecurity… Because I don’t think you’ll link anything, because you have no value.