• pianoplant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Clearly this is someone who actually reads their books. Given that they are mass market paperbacks… I have no problem with this. If I were an author I would much rather someone does this to my work and actually reads it and enjoys it to someone keeping a pristine copy unopened on their shelf forever.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      infinite jest is half footnotes, which are at the back of the book, which is part of the “joke” of the book, being based around extreme academia.

        • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I mean I know nothing about this book besides what I’ve read about it in these two comments, but it is called infinite jest, why is it so hard to believe that it’s a joke?

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Maybe go to a bookstore, pick up a copy, and leaf through it. I think you’ll understand exactly what I mean pretty quickly. The book is pretentious drivel.

            • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              55 minutes ago

              Which apparently is the whole joke about this book. Maybe I should pick it up and see what this whole discussion is about lol

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s a reference to Shakespeare, when Hamlet finds the skull of the old court jester who looked after him as a child. “Alas! poor Yorrick! I knew him, Horatio. A man of infinite jest and most excellent fancy. He hath borne me on his back a thousand times…”

            In the book, it’s the name of a film made by the protagonist’s late Dad, one which combines a myriad of new and experimental film techniques and technical application of lenses with some incredibly beautiful people - and is so compelling that if you watch it you can’t stop watching it until you starve to death.

            The book juxtaposes the obviously bad addiction of drugs and shows us the journey of an addict trying to gain a control of their life, with a bunch of “good” addictions amongst a group of adolescent boys trying to become tennis pros at an ivy-league-type college.

            With a bunch of criticism of American life: Years no longer have numbers like 1997 or 2008, they are sponsored by brands so there’s Year of the Whopper, Year of Glad Flaccid Plastic Receptical Products, Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment… Canada, Mexico and the USA have formed into one giant country after the mid-west became uninhabitable due to pollution…

            honestly I love the book but you have to be a certain type of person to love it.

            • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              Hmm that does sound like an interesting book, not gonna lie. But I see how the name of the book doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s an elaborate meta-joke

    • Karl@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I can sense Booktokers rushing this way to tell you you broke one of the book rules