“What’s funny about that is they assume my ambition is positional. They assume my ambition is a title or a seat. My ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country. Presidents come and go, elected officials come and go, single payer healthcare is forever.”

  • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Im pretty sure that is a “no, not this time” answer.

    I think she knows where she can do the most good, and survive to do the most good.

    I like AOC but i dont think she is ready for the international political scene. I think she knows it as well. Domestic issues need her more, which happens in Congress.

    And Jon Stewart, well i like him too but … another celebrity/actor president? Really?

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      celebrity/actor isn’t the issue.

      It’s the content of one’s character. Jon Stewart has already proven himself very aware of the political state and being able to bully Congress into submission on behalf of vets and first-responders.

      So yes, this is not a non-starter in any way shape or form, if we know they’re intelligent, authentic, charismatic, and empathetic.

    • Shayeta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      At this point I don’t care. Trump set the bar so low that a colony of fermenting yeast would do a better job.

      Let alone someone with actual good intentions.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You cannot give weapons to Israel and say you have good intentions. But if we reach a point where actual democratic orgs can tell her what to do, her personal intentions aren’t so important.

          • MBech@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            Before and during the primaries is exactly where these issues should be highlighted. Both to find the candidates with as few dead bodies in their closet as possible, but also to force the candidates to publicly address these issues.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think she’d be great because she would hire very smart people to advise her on her weak areas. “If you’re dumb, surround yourself with smart people. And if you’re smart, surround yourself with smart people who disagree with you.” She’s smart, and she knows a lot of smart people.

    • belunos@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      100%. Both her and Stewart are in the exact positions they need to be in to be the most useful to our country. Stewart gets the views of the center, while she works on progressive projects, where she can. Politics gets folks emotional, but it’s best to plan from reason.