• SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    That’s Capitalism, working! The peasantry don’t need water or electricity. They can use candles and go to the creek.

    – Every CEO, probably

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    TL;DR: American power grid sucks and allows connecting extreme variable loads without any mitigation measures.

  • ZeroCool@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yep, soon enough we’ll all be just as fucked as Texans during a cold snap.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Idea: put the data centers in Texas. They have their own grid separate from the other two. It’ll be fun.

        • UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Exactly my point. We (royal we, referring to a large proportion of US inhabitants) pay a privately owned corporation for services essential to living. They are allowed to extract profit via rate hikes and service cuts and are additionally allowed to develop monopolies. Dead people are a sacrifice private industry is willing to make in pursuit of profit (see: American death ensurance).

          The “separate but equal” Texan electrical grid is a textbook example of why utilities management should remain under the purview of a publicly-accountable governing body. My quip is dark because people died. Its also true. Its meant to quietly challenge the concept that a government levying taxes is tyrannical.

  • Casterial@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    21 hours ago

    What did we expect? We focused on military, not infrastructure. Our government believes solar, wind, and hydro is useless and clean coal is the only source

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not all of north america.

      Canada is a world leader in nuclear and number 3 for hydro for example.

      • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Being a world leader in nuclear power just means you have more than three power plants and you haven’t been bombed by israel or the US for it.

        • klankin@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          And developed a reactor that doesnt need enriched uranium, removing the risk of weapons development.

          And have been one of the few countries to deploy reactors under budget and on time.

          • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You mean thorium reactors, invented in the US in the 1950s? Or recycle reactors, also invented by the US in the 1950s?

            Also that second part also describes the actual world leader in nuclear power which has more than 100x the reactors of Canada and no nuclear disasters on record…

            • klankin@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Like the “hasnt left the lab in 75 years” thorium reactors (Which current designs still need enriched uranium)? and the recycle reactors that produce weapons grade plutonium (Of course, also via enriched uranium)? Id love to see you

              No I dont mean those, I mean the CANDU’s, a viable system that has been operating for around the same amount of time thorium has been in development hell (again, 75 years).

              Are you trying to say america has never had a nuclear disaster on record? Cause its pretty easy to google that US has had more nuclear accidents in the 2000’s than canada has in the past century. The Three Mile Island meltdown was probably the worst nuclear accident in north america, its hardly reasonable to ignore it. Unless you count uranium mining accidents, cause then the Church Rock uranium mill takes the crown.

              And which country has ~2000 nuclear reactors? I must have missed this in my research, with those numbers they account for approximately 4x the total number of reactors in the world, a surprising oversight. (Or are you doing some football math that 94/19 = 100x? Cause even if 94/19=5x then per capita america is still lacking)

              • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                China, was the magic answer, at 62 current reactors and another 50 expected to come online by 2030. Without a single nuclear disaster.

                To the rest of your nonsense, CANDUs still require enriched uranium. As in, if the ‘natural uranium’ (the “organic” label of the nuclear world) does not have enough 238, it can’t work.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Naw duh. You could probably replace 50 data centers with 12 jumping spider brains, those are some really intelligent critters…