- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- technology@lemmy.world
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- technology@lemmy.world
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.radio/post/13272508
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.radio/post/13272508
This is what happens on construction projects where the municipality isn’t properly enforcing or securing the construction site’s access to water, and it happens a lot. Municipalities should be held accountable by their constituency for the failure to secure access and bill construction companies regardless of what kind of construction is being done. They meter the water of regular users, industrial use should also be metered and paid for.
Don’t at me with BS about how AI companies shouldn’t be building data centers. I know. I agree. That is a separate issue from the failure of the municipality here.
A bit of quick research tells me that 29 million gallons of water costs about $150,000… so when can we expect the construction company to be charged with grand larceny?
Nothing in the article about them even being back-charged for the water they used. Literally just some nonsense about not fining them.
I don’t think that grand larceny charge is coming. Just a hunch.