• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    The reason Meta could operate that way was because they were a platform for people sending funny texts to each other with no promises of security or privacy.

    By the way, even they don’t operate like that anymore.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m basing that on my experience contracting there ~ 1.5 years ago. They’ve added new control systems to address things like the GDPR, but they are all still designed to be fully productized parts of their developer framework so that developers don’t have to think about them and can still move just as fast with product / feature development.

      And while their product market had a little bit to do with it, they quite frankly have buggy software in production for less time than most major SAAS vendors or contract built systems.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        As you noticed, they have had a quality assurance structure for way longer than 2 years. They’ve had it for close to 20 years now.

        When they used to have this philosophy, they did always have something broken on their site, and go out of air once in a while. And they did benefit greatly from the speed they got from it, for a while, until it started being harmful.