• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Biden was in the process of banning it.

    Trump wanted to ban it during his first term after TT users organized RSVPing a Trump event he booked an entire stadium for. TT responded by hiring a bunch of natsec ghouls to run moderation, and someone in Trump’s staff did the very basic math of “promoting a ban of popular thing hurts election chances and has literally no benefits”.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Congress was in the process of banning all data collection which operated for a list of adversarial nations maintained by the Pentagon.

      Biden promised not to shut it down during the campaign.

      Literally nobody went into TikTok HQ and forced them to turn off and then on again.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          According to your own link the bill was proposed by Trump, passed with Bipartisan support, and was unenforceable until after Biden would long since be gone from office.

          What are you claiming I rewrote? What specifically do you think was incorrect about my summary?

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            The democrats were pushing hard for a tiktok ban during Biden’s entire term. You are rewriting history as if Tiktok shutting down preemptively wasn’t in response to a ban that was going to hit in a couple months under the Biden regime.

            • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              There isn’t anything “preemptive” about it, the Chinese dictatorship used it to interfere in US elections and the result of that interference is the Trump administration.

              TikTok was a weapon from its inception.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                If that was true, they wouldn’t have tried to toady up to the state department by hiring a bunch of natsec ghouls and suppressing divisive content like BLM after Trump started chirping about banning them. It was dumb when Trump tried and the users didn’t like that, it was even dumber for the Biden admin to see this, and then do it themselves.

                • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  Small correction, TikTok did not suppress BLM, although it did ban the phrase White Lives Matter, more accurately TikTok has always been actively suppressing Black creators in general. It still is, too. Which is just on brand for those CCP fucks and Tankies like yourself.

                  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    They did in late 2020, blm content vanished from fyps so fast

                    Which is just on brand for those CCP fucks and Tankies like yourself.

                    What the fuck?