“These are people I’ve gotten to know over the years,” Trump began. “It started around 2015, and then went into 2016 when the presidency began—officially began—but I’ve known him actually, for a long time.”

Archive article: https://archive.ph/FbA9d#selection-1403.0-1403.206

  • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    In general, I agree. However, every mention of him without mentioning the Epstein files is a distraction. So, if you want to say something like this senile, old pedofile needs to release the Epstein files, that would be okay. But the Epstein files needs to be continuously kept in the public stream of consciousness or it will be forgotten.

    • primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      You’re not mentioning him. You’re creating associations.

      The Catholic church is notorious for trumping little boys. I just took a big steaming trump. I… I think he put something in my drink but I was still kinda conscious–he trumped me. Over and over again. I need a trump kit and an sti test.

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think it’s fine to brand him the way you’re doing. I am simply stating that any time Trump is mentioned, by name or reference, we need to mention the Epstein files needing to be released.