I don’t get the downvotes, I agree with you. It’s not okay, and yes, it’s legally rape, but it doesn’t have to be traumatizing the victims in the same way as the examples you also mentioned. And that’s not an excuse, but a reasonable answer to the question you responded to.
The critical thinking required is to admit that someone under the age of consent cannot consent. The attractive rock star is just as evil as the hideous Epstein client.
You’re a fucking idiot. But you seem to be in very good company here. The fact that you don’t register that it’s not even specifically Steven Tyler we’re talking about; but the difference between a minor that wants to have sex with an adult willingly (which is the hang up I think), regardless of legality, and a person of any age being physically or otherwise forcesor coerces an unwilling participant into sexual acts. Yes, both situations are bad things. No, they are not equivalent. That’s what my first comment said, I have repeated it multiple times, other people with first hand experience have added their two cents. It’s ultimately up to you to rub a few neurons together long enough to process a rational argument and not responding emotionally. Have a nice evening.
That’s what I’ve been saying so if we’re saying the same thing why are you getting so bent out of shape when I say that fourteen year olds can’t consent to being raped by adults?
I don’t get the downvotes, I agree with you. It’s not okay, and yes, it’s legally rape, but it doesn’t have to be traumatizing the victims in the same way as the examples you also mentioned. And that’s not an excuse, but a reasonable answer to the question you responded to.
Yea but it’s easier to join a dog pile than it is to think critically.
The worst part about reddit that lemmy just copied inherently.
Yay social media!
The critical thinking required is to admit that someone under the age of consent cannot consent. The attractive rock star is just as evil as the hideous Epstein client.
Oh no no no. They had sex slaves on that island. It is not the same.
Steven Tyler forced his rape victim to have an abortion after he impregnated her because he was also her legal guardian.
But no, you’re right. It’s much more acceptable.
Steven Tyler took his victim on tour as his sex slave.
So you think that if a fourteen year old likes getting raped it’s not that bad?
Where’s the cut-off in your mind?
Is it not that tramatizing if it’s a promiscuous six year old?
Holy shit, I didn’t realize this community actually harbored people rationalizing the rape of 14 year olds.
What the fuck.
You’re a fucking idiot. But you seem to be in very good company here. The fact that you don’t register that it’s not even specifically Steven Tyler we’re talking about; but the difference between a minor that wants to have sex with an adult willingly (which is the hang up I think), regardless of legality, and a person of any age being physically or otherwise forces or coerces an unwilling participant into sexual acts. Yes, both situations are bad things. No, they are not equivalent. That’s what my first comment said, I have repeated it multiple times, other people with first hand experience have added their two cents. It’s ultimately up to you to rub a few neurons together long enough to process a rational argument and not responding emotionally. Have a nice evening.
I know it’s fucking disgusting.
Man reading comprehension sure is dead
It may surprise you to learn that SatansMaggotyCumFart is a troll.
Explain to me how a fourteen year old can give consent to an adult.
They can’t, that’s the point. You’d understand that if you had graduated middle school.
That’s what I’ve been saying so if we’re saying the same thing why are you getting so bent out of shape when I say that fourteen year olds can’t consent to being raped by adults?