What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly “inevitable” changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.
loss of employment? Check.
profound change to living conditions? Check.
loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
increasing likelihood of war? Check.
threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.
How else do you think they will get a one world government? Cause the problems, depopulate the “undesirables”, cause conflict, and offer a solution to fix what you have created. Not a hard concept. The only way people will accept a totalitarian techno-fascist one world government is with an overwhelming catastrophe.
What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly “inevitable” changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.
It’s as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the “accusation in a mirror” pattern.
How else do you think they will get a one world government? Cause the problems, depopulate the “undesirables”, cause conflict, and offer a solution to fix what you have created. Not a hard concept. The only way people will accept a totalitarian techno-fascist one world government is with an overwhelming catastrophe.