• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    And it combines the silly “kkk” thing with calling US citizens “American”, which IMO is in bad taste considering that US elites claim imperial ownership over the entire continent and just generally a dick move towards the majority of North+South America’s population.

    Granted, I haven’t seen a good alternative in spoken language. “US citizen” doesn’t roll of the tongue well (and ignores the millions of non-citizen US residents), and “USAian” is definitely not going to catch on outside of niche internet communities.

    • pingveno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It isn’t really an imperial thing. It’s that, 250 years ago, when the tiny, newly independent nation was deciding on a name, no one bothered themselves with a new and unique name. And as you noted, American is the only part of that name that works as a description of a resident, even if it’s nonsensical.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Sure feels like an imperial thing.

        There’s actually a Wikipedia article on USA demonyms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonyms_for_the_United_States
        Spanish actually uses “estadounidense” (~“United Statesian”), because they do use “American” to refer to inhabitants of the continent. In English, “US-American” is probably the best option, though “United Stater” doesn’t sound terrible, either.