• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Having an option vs not having an option

    Also Linux and Windows are pretty different in use cases and capabilities. Meanwhile, local AI models have a very similar user experience. If hardware was cheaper and people could run better LLMs locally, they wouldn’t pay monthly for it.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’re right, the general public doesn’t use Linux due to the lack of ability to browse the web and file their taxes—Windows exclusive functionality.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In the workplace, there are still a lot of domain specific programs that don’t have Linux support. Companies don’t have much of an incentive to port that stuff over. As for the people who just need a web browser, they probably would use Linux just fine if they could buy a computer at BestBuy that comes with Linux preinstalled

        Compare that to LLM programs, where it’s a matter of “download this app instead of that one, because this one is free and that one costs $25 a month”