• iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      I don’t think that we see the same increase in pedestrian fatalities in other countries though, which do have smart phones but do not have massive personal trucks.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Why not both?

      If phones are causing more collisions… then bigger vehicles have more kinetic energy, hence more deaths…

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        The kinetic energy difference between a 180 pound person and a 3,000 pound vehicle or a 6,000 pound vehicle is completely irrelevant. The height of impact from a truck or suv is what makes it worse.

        Either way, it’s surely more like 90% cell phones distracting drivers than it is vehicle type.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Bigger in the context of vehicles means not only heavier, but also a higher point of impact. It could be the difference between getting hit in the legs vs the torso. Or the difference between rolling onto the hood vs knocked down and run over.

        • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 minutes ago

          Kinetic energy is related to mass and the square of velocity

          A heavier vehicle absolutely has more killing power against a pedestrian…

          You’re right. The mass of the pedestrian makes no difference… any vehicle is going to turn them into a red mist